So, folks, just came back from a whirlwind trip to Ottawa. Left Wednesday afternoon and returned Friday morning. Kind of nice to have a break from the kids, but I was so busy and so stressed out that it wasn't very relaxing. Plus I stood around a lot feeling lonely (one of those networking events that I absolutely detest). I know I should just go and strike up conversations with people, after all, I'm certainly not the only one who didn't know anyone there. But I hate it so much, and I am still getting over a cold so I was never sure if my voice would actually work each time I opened my mouth. Poor me! Whine whine whine :-)
So what I'm disgusted about is this: on friday morning the Globe and Mail and various other newspapers carried a picture, on their front page, of a man holding a child, presumably his own, and presumably dead. The poor man was distraught, understandably, and the child looked to be anywhere between 6 and 10 years old, give or take. Ok, fine, tear-jerker, grabs the attention of the jaded public, but what really bothered me is that the child's naked back and buttocks were exposed.
How degrading, to be paraded about partially nude across the world's newspapers just to sell a few more issues. Not that the child was in any position to care, but I was offended that the photographer and newspaper editors had
so little respect for the dignity of the man and his child, and for human life in general, that they would use this simply to grub a few more dollars.
I wanted to give you a link to the photo so that you could judge for yourselves, but I can't find ANY copies on the internet. Makes me wonder if I'm not the only one who didn't like it!
That's my rant for today; cya...